on the Steiner tree
connecting
a fractal set
[E. Paolini: Università di Pisa]
Brixen ‐ Jun 2, 2023
Joint work with E. Stepanov
Plan
- the classical Steiner Problem
- generalization to infinite sets
- minimality of the infinite self-similar complete binary tree
Fermàt point
(Cavalieri, Torricelli)
Extension proposed by Steiner
Generalization proposed by Courant-Robbins (1941)
Formalization given by Jarník-Kössler (1934)
Steps for existence:
- no loops
- a priori bound on topology
- reduction to finite dimensional problem
Examples:
Classical approach:
union of curves,
Ivanov-Tuzhilin (1984)
Set theoretic approach:
compact sets, Hausdorff measure
Ambrosio-Tilli (2004)
GMT approach:
$G$-currents and calibrations,
Marchese-Massacesi (2016)
Set theoretic approach
-
the ambient is a metric space $X$
-
the given is a compact set $\color{yellow} A$
-
the unknown is a set $\color{white}S$
-
the energy is the Hausdorff $\mathcal H^1$ measure
-
the constraint is topological connectedness
Tools
-
compactness:
the family of compact subsets of a compact space
is compact in the Hausdorff metric (Blaschke)
-
lower-semicontinuity:
$\mathcal H^1$ is l.s.c. with respect to the Hausdorff metric
on connected sets (Gołąb)
possible formulations
Given a compact set $\color{yellow} A$,
find $\color{white} S$
such that $\mathcal H^1({\color{white}S})$ is minimal
among all sets such that (choose one):
(a) $\color{white} S$ is a compact connected set containing $\color{yellow} A$
(b) $\color{white} S$ is a compact connected set such that ${\color{white}S}\cup {\color{yellow}A}$ is also connected
(Ducret-Troyanov, 2008)
(c) ${\color{white}S}\cup {\color{yellow}A}$ is connected
(P.-Stepanov, 2012)
comparing the different formulations (1)
comparing the different formulations (2)
Existence
If $X$ is a proper complete connected metric space then
minimizers exist.
Properties of minimizers, formulation (c)
If $\color{white} S$ is a minimizer with $\mathcal H^1({\color{white}S})<\infty$ then
- $\color{white} S$ contains no loops
- each connected component $C$ of ${\color{white}S}\setminus \color{yellow}A$ has
$\mathcal H^1(\bar C) = \mathcal H^1(C) > 0$
and $\bar C$ has at most one single point on each
connected component of $\color{yellow} A$
-
connected components of ${\color{white}S}\setminus {\color{yellow}A}$
are countable
-
${\color{white}S}\setminus {\color{yellow}A}$ is a locally finite
embedded tree composed by geodesic arcs
Example 1
$$
{{\color{yellow}A}}=\left\{\left(\frac 1 n,\frac 1 m\right)\colon n,m \in \mathbb N \cup \{\infty\}\right\}
$$
Minimizers have infinite length.
Example 2
${\color{yellow}A} \subset [0,1]$ totally disconnected, uncountable,
$\mathcal H^1({\color{yellow}A})>0$, ${\color{white}S}=[0,1]\setminus {\color{yellow}A}$ (Cantor-like)
$$
\#\{\text{c.c. of } {\color{yellow}A}\}
>
\#\{\text{c.c. of } {\color{white}S}\}
$$
$$
\mathcal H^1(\bar {\color{white}S}) > \mathcal H^1({\color{white}S})
$$
Example 3
If $\color{yellow} A$ is not bounded minimizers could not exist
Example 5 (open problem)
What if $\color{yellow} A$ is bounded but not closed?
In this case minimizers exist
and ${\color{white}S}\cup {\color{yellow}A}$ is connected but
not pathwise-connected.
The self-similar full binary tree Example
-
P-Stepanov-Teplitskaya (2015): $\color{white} S$ is the unique minimizer
if $\lambda_n\to 0$ very fast.
-
Cherkashin-Teplitskaya (2023): $\color{white} S$ is a minimizer
if $\lambda_n = \lambda^n$ with $\lambda$ sufficiently small.
Note: if $\lambda_n=\lambda^n$ the set $\color{yellow} A$ has
a self-similarity dimension $d = \frac{\log 2}{-\log \lambda}$
which is $d>1$ for $\lambda>\frac 1 2$.
Proof (2)
\[
\varepsilon_0 \le \varepsilon_1^+ + \varepsilon_1^-
\le 2 \max\{\varepsilon_1^+,\varepsilon_1^-\}
= 2 \varepsilon_1\\
\varepsilon_n \le \lambda_{n+1} \le \lambda^{n+1}
\]
thank you!